2017
Sáiz-Manzanares, María Consuelo; Marticorena-Sánchez, Raúl; García-Osorio, César; Díez-Pastor, José Francisco
How Do B-Learning and Learning Patterns Influence Learning Outcomes? Journal Article
In: Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 8, pp. 745, 2017, ISSN: 1664-1078.
Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: B-Learning, Computer Science teaching, eLearning, SELECTED
@article{10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00745,
title = {How Do B-Learning and Learning Patterns Influence Learning Outcomes?},
author = {María Consuelo Sáiz-Manzanares and Raúl Marticorena-Sánchez and César García-Osorio and José Francisco Díez-Pastor},
url = {http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00745},
doi = {10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00745},
issn = {1664-1078},
year = {2017},
date = {2017-01-01},
journal = {Frontiers in Psychology},
volume = {8},
pages = {745},
abstract = {Learning Management System (LMS) platforms provide a wealth of information on the learning patterns of students. Learning Analytics (LA) techniques permit the analysis of the logs or records of the activities of both students and teachers on the on-line platform. The learning patterns differ depending on the type of Blended Learning (B-Learning). In this study, we analyse: 1) whether significant differences exist between the learning outcomes of students and their learning patterns on the platform, depending on the type of B-Learning [Replacement blend (RB) vs. Supplemental blend (SB)]; 2) whether a relation exists between the metacognitive and the motivational strategies of students, their learning outcomes and their learning patterns on the platform. The 87,065 log records of 129 students (69 in RB and 60 in SB) in the Moodle 3.1 platform were analysed. The results revealed different learning patterns between students depending on the type of B-Learning (RB vs. SB). We have found that the degree of blend, RB vs. SB, seems to condition student behaviour on the platform. Learning patterns in RB environments can predict student learning outcomes. Additionally, in RB environments there is a relationship between the learning patterns and the metacognitive and motivational strategies of the students.},
keywords = {B-Learning, Computer Science teaching, eLearning, SELECTED},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
Learning Management System (LMS) platforms provide a wealth of information on the learning patterns of students. Learning Analytics (LA) techniques permit the analysis of the logs or records of the activities of both students and teachers on the on-line platform. The learning patterns differ depending on the type of Blended Learning (B-Learning). In this study, we analyse: 1) whether significant differences exist between the learning outcomes of students and their learning patterns on the platform, depending on the type of B-Learning [Replacement blend (RB) vs. Supplemental blend (SB)]; 2) whether a relation exists between the metacognitive and the motivational strategies of students, their learning outcomes and their learning patterns on the platform. The 87,065 log records of 129 students (69 in RB and 60 in SB) in the Moodle 3.1 platform were analysed. The results revealed different learning patterns between students depending on the type of B-Learning (RB vs. SB). We have found that the degree of blend, RB vs. SB, seems to condition student behaviour on the platform. Learning patterns in RB environments can predict student learning outcomes. Additionally, in RB environments there is a relationship between the learning patterns and the metacognitive and motivational strategies of the students.